Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release 1.1 (Windows and Version Solver) #4028

Closed
1 of 2 tasks
stubailo opened this issue Mar 26, 2015 · 13 comments
Closed
1 of 2 tasks

Release 1.1 (Windows and Version Solver) #4028

stubailo opened this issue Mar 26, 2015 · 13 comments

Comments

@stubailo
Copy link
Contributor

This issue tracks the release of Meteor 1.1. Have any concerns? Mention them here. Finding that the RCs are working great? Mention that here. We will keep this top-level description updated with known issues.

The current RC is 1.1-rc.0. Update an app to the release candidate with:

meteor update --release 1.1-rc.0

For Windows, get the installer here.

The two major additions in this release are:

  1. Support for the Windows operating system
  2. The new faster and more accurate package version solver

Read the release notes for a complete list of the changes in this release.

TODO before final release

  • Sign Windows installer with extended validation certificate
  • Email binary package authors to publish their packages for Windows

RC History

  • 1.1-rc.0: initial release candidate
@grigio
Copy link

grigio commented Mar 26, 2015

Hi, I received this automated message for grigio:babel but I don't depend on native libs anymore, so it works already on any supported arch.

@glasser
Copy link
Contributor

glasser commented Mar 27, 2015

@grigio Yes, I believe this just means that older versions need to be published if you care to allow the older versions to work on Windows (which may or may not make sense based on your package)!

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 28, 2015

Can you put #3957 (Fix for meteor --test timing issues) into the 1.1 release, please. It's a serious issue for people with bigger apps.

@stubailo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sanjo unfortunately, we can't put any more things into 1.1 because we are in the middle of QA and don't want to start over. I'm sure there will be another release soon after with this fix.

@avital
Copy link
Contributor

avital commented Mar 28, 2015

I don't think we need to restart QA if we take #3957, since it only changes meteor run --test and meteor test-packages --velocity, both of which aren't tested by our QA process.

So I suggest we consider taking the change for 1.1, since I've definitely heard that timing issues are a huge problem for Velocity users. (I assume this change fixes the root problem, but I don't actually know that for a fact.)

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 28, 2015

I don't think we need to restart QA if we take #3957, since it only changes meteor run --test and meteor test-packages --velocity, both of which aren't tested by our QA process.

So I suggest we consider taking the change for 1.1, since I've definitely heard that timing issues are a huge problem for Velocity users. (I assume this change fixes the root problem, but I don't actually know that for a fact.)

Exactly that. Without the fix meteor run --test and meteor test-packages --velocity will never exit when the testing mirror takes too long to start. This makes using this commands in CI unreliable. Many users have reported this (see linked GitHub issues in pull-request to name a few). The scope of the changes is only the Velocity specific code in Meteor Core, so there should be no risk in putting it still in like Avital said. I've tested the changes manually to make sure they work.

@stubailo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sanjo your commit is going to be in 1.1! Awesome.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 31, 2015

@stubailo Great! Thanks.

@stubailo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Released!

@avital
Copy link
Contributor

avital commented Apr 1, 2015

🎆

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 1, 2015

@stubailo #3957 seems to not be in 1.1 :-(

@glasser
Copy link
Contributor

glasser commented Apr 1, 2015

@sanjo That appears to be accurate.

@stubailo
Copy link
Contributor Author

stubailo commented Apr 1, 2015

:( I must have made a git error somewhere, my apologies. My intention was
to include it.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:26 AM Jonas Aschenbrenner notifications@github.com
wrote:

@stubailo https://github.com/stubailo #3957
#3957 seems to not be in 1.1 :-(


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#4028 (comment).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants