Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use more specific code for Ulcus in medical history? #11

Open
michaelonken opened this issue Apr 8, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Use more specific code for Ulcus in medical history? #11

michaelonken opened this issue Apr 8, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@michaelonken
Copy link
Owner

[via data4life]

Ulcus: Might it be possible to use one of the child-codes of SNOMED 56208002 (“Ulcer (morphologic abnormality)“) here? Either as the result (with a generic code for examniation) or as the code itself, with value[x] left out (cf. Observation code patterns 1 & 4 from the FHIR spec)

@michaelonken
Copy link
Owner Author

michaelonken commented Apr 8, 2022

More context: Right now Ulcer uses the SCT 56208002 code ("Ulcer (morphologic abnormality"), i.e.

  • Observation.code = "Ulcer (morphologic abnormality"
  • Observation.value = "superficial" or "deep" or "no" or "procedure not done"

The proposal is to allow a more specific coding by facilitating one of the child codes 56208002, which tell more about the specific abnormality of the Ulcer than the parent code does. One of these two ways are proposed:

  1. Observation.code = <Ulcer (morphologic abnormality> and Observation.value = , e.g. "Acute ulcer"
  2. Observation.code = and Observation.value not being set

I think we should also try to keep the original value coding ("superficial" or "deep" or "no" or "procedure not done") and do a slicing on Observation.value[x].

From the two proposals I'd personally prefer 1.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant