Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

market1501 got 91.7% accuracy of top 1 , but cuhk03 only got 66.6% #2

Closed
jokerlc opened this issue Jun 24, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Comments

@jokerlc
Copy link

jokerlc commented Jun 24, 2018

hi, why i only got 66.6% top 1 accuracy on cuhk03 dataset with the same setting as martket1501 trainning ? (python train_ml_alignedreid.py -d cuhk03 -a resnet50 --test_distance global_local --stepsize 150 --lr 0.0002 --save-dir ./log/resnet50-cuhk03-test1/ --train-batch 256 --eval-step 150 --max-epoch 300 --reranking )

@michuanhaohao
Copy link
Owner

@jokerlc CUHK03 updated its evaluation, which is different from original paper. So 66.6% top-1 is high performance for cuhk03. The softmax baseline is 47.5% mAP for "New" CUHK03.

Use -d cuhk03 when running the training code. In default mode, we use new split (767/700). If you wanna use the original splits (1367/100) created by [13], specify --cuhk03-classic-split. As [13] computes CMC differently from Market1501, you might need to specify --use-metric-cuhk03 for fair comparison with their method. In addition, we support both labeled and detected modes. The default mode loads detected images. Specify --cuhk03-labeled if you wanna train and test on labeled images.

@jokerlc
Copy link
Author

jokerlc commented Jul 4, 2018

@michuanhaohao Thanks!

@michuanhaohao
Copy link
Owner

Done

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants