You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
hi, why i only got 66.6% top 1 accuracy on cuhk03 dataset with the same setting as martket1501 trainning ? (python train_ml_alignedreid.py -d cuhk03 -a resnet50 --test_distance global_local --stepsize 150 --lr 0.0002 --save-dir ./log/resnet50-cuhk03-test1/ --train-batch 256 --eval-step 150 --max-epoch 300 --reranking )
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@jokerlc CUHK03 updated its evaluation, which is different from original paper. So 66.6% top-1 is high performance for cuhk03. The softmax baseline is 47.5% mAP for "New" CUHK03.
Use -d cuhk03 when running the training code. In default mode, we use new split (767/700). If you wanna use the original splits (1367/100) created by [13], specify --cuhk03-classic-split. As [13] computes CMC differently from Market1501, you might need to specify --use-metric-cuhk03 for fair comparison with their method. In addition, we support both labeled and detected modes. The default mode loads detected images. Specify --cuhk03-labeled if you wanna train and test on labeled images.
hi, why i only got 66.6% top 1 accuracy on cuhk03 dataset with the same setting as martket1501 trainning ? (python train_ml_alignedreid.py -d cuhk03 -a resnet50 --test_distance global_local --stepsize 150 --lr 0.0002 --save-dir ./log/resnet50-cuhk03-test1/ --train-batch 256 --eval-step 150 --max-epoch 300 --reranking )
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: