Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

do we really need a chemical_entity_set? #2146

Closed
turbomam opened this issue Jul 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed

do we really need a chemical_entity_set? #2146

turbomam opened this issue Jul 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@cmungall @kheal @turbomam

Comments

@turbomam
Copy link
Member

turbomam commented Jul 24, 2024 •
edited
Loading

If we can find one or more namespaces that unambiguously identify reagents and metabolites, with high fidelity regarding the forms of those chemicals, then we don't need a chemical_entity_set. We just need slots that mention the external identifiers. Conventionally, those would be web-resolvable CURIes.
@turbomam turbomam mentioned this issue Jul 24, 2024
Open
@microbiomedata microbiomedata locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 24, 2024
@kheal kheal converted this issue into discussion #2148 Jul 24, 2024

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Assignees

@cmungall cmungall

@kheal kheal

@turbomam turbomam

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@cmungall @kheal @turbomam