Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to use camera features without .Net? #215

Closed
MikeGlue opened this issue May 12, 2017 · 7 comments
Closed

How to use camera features without .Net? #215

MikeGlue opened this issue May 12, 2017 · 7 comments
Labels
enhancement This is an enhancement suggestion to existing functionality shipped

Comments

@MikeGlue
Copy link
Contributor

We are using the device camera in our extension. Is there a solution coming that will allow us to do that, since the current solution uses a .Net library?

@StanislawStempin StanislawStempin added accepted enhancement This is an enhancement suggestion to existing functionality labels May 20, 2017
@StanislawStempin
Copy link

This functionality is not supported yet due to removal of .NET interop. It will be enabled in the future after we add back support for client add-ins that do not rely on .NET.

@StanislawStempin StanislawStempin added this to the Backlog milestone May 20, 2017
@unnur
Copy link

unnur commented Aug 30, 2017

We are using this as well - do you know when this is planned to be supported?

@MikeGlue
Copy link
Contributor Author

Now that javascript addins are supported, any update on the timeline for using the built-in NAV addins?

@StanislawStempin
Copy link

We are actively working on WebPageViewer and Camera. They should be available publicly in December Update.

@defr0std
Copy link
Contributor

@MikeGlue @unnur
For the camera support, would it be an acceptable solution to have an intermediate generic page which would take the picture and provide the result stream/blob back to the caller?
Kind of C/AL wrapper, but using a page instead of a codeunit. The calling code could call RunModal and the page can request a picture on page open and close itself when the picture is ready.
This way it should take the same number of clicks to obtain a picture from the camera, and the remaining inconvenience would be an extra page being displayed...

@MikeGlue
Copy link
Contributor Author

That sounds like a viable solution I think. As you said though, as long as the number of clicks doesn't increase so that it remains easy to use.

@unnur
Copy link

unnur commented Oct 23, 2017

Sounds like a good solution to us.

@StanislawStempin StanislawStempin added ships-in-future-update The issue is fixed in our 'master' branch and will ship in the next PREVIEW release and removed accepted labels Dec 7, 2017
@StanislawStempin StanislawStempin modified the milestones: Backlog, Holiday Update Dec 7, 2017
@StanislawStempin StanislawStempin added shipped and removed ships-in-future-update The issue is fixed in our 'master' branch and will ship in the next PREVIEW release labels Dec 20, 2017
@microsoft microsoft locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 12, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement This is an enhancement suggestion to existing functionality shipped
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants