Discussion: Lots of Private Branches #7483
michael-hawker
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 4 comments
-
@ranjeshj and @jevansaks FYI |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
The PR policy to delete branches after merge helped a lot. But there's still quite a lot of stale non-working branches. Perhaps people who don't clean up their stale branches get their repo write permissions revoked? 😲 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
@kmgallahan just cleaned some of mine up :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Discussion: Private Branches
We had an issue on the Windows Community Toolkit about the number of non-active/private branches we had on the main repo: CommunityToolkit/WindowsCommunityToolkit#3321
Looks like WinUI is getting more branches too, which makes it a bit harder to realize there's release branches for each release.
Contributors should instead fork the repo and create branches in their forks and then create pull requests from there.
I've been considering turning off write access for branches on the main repo to ensure contributors use forks as well...
Just wanted to carry this suggestion forward.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions