This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 1, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 198
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3289 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 31.45% 31.45%
=======================================
Files 307 307
Lines 37239 37202 -37
=======================================
- Hits 11712 11703 -9
+ Misses 25527 25499 -28
|
chkeita
approved these changes
Jul 13, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Starts to address #3158.
Rather than storing the UPN and then removing it later, do not store it in the first place.
I found one problem while working on this which was that
UserInfo
was not actually stored onJob
, so address that as well. This was because properties which are not constructor parameters are not stored by the ORM, so I've also removed other examples fromTask
andNode
and have them only on the response types.Also started to simplify the ORM roundtripping tests; remove the custom equality comparison and instead simply compare JSON-serialized values. Rely on the FsCheck automatic generation of values where it works, rather than writing a custom Arbitrary which does the same thing.