Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[vcpkg_test_cmake] Reconstruction function #13802

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[vcpkg_test_cmake] Reconstruction function #13802

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

JackBoosY
Copy link
Contributor

Use the vcpkg toolchain to test the cmake file exported by the port to ensure that the header file, function and target are correct.

@JackBoosY JackBoosY added requires:discussion category:vcpkg-feature The issue is a new capability of the tool that doesn’t already exist and we haven’t committed info:internal This PR or Issue was filed by the vcpkg team. labels Sep 29, 2020
@JackBoosY
Copy link
Contributor Author

Duplicate with PR #13065.

@JackBoosY JackBoosY marked this pull request as draft September 29, 2020 01:46
@JackBoosY
Copy link
Contributor Author

Temporary close this PR, will continue this work in the future.

@JackBoosY JackBoosY closed this Oct 27, 2020
@JackBoosY
Copy link
Contributor Author

Replaced by #15173.

@JackBoosY JackBoosY deleted the dev/jack/re-write-vcpkg-test-cmake branch December 21, 2020 09:59
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@strega-nil strega-nil Awaiting requested review from strega-nil

@BillyONeal BillyONeal Awaiting requested review from BillyONeal

Assignees

@PhoebeHui PhoebeHui

Labels
category:vcpkg-feature The issue is a new capability of the tool that doesn’t already exist and we haven’t committed info:internal This PR or Issue was filed by the vcpkg team.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@JackBoosY @PhoebeHui