Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Web based configuration app #24

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Jun 4, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

Web based configuration app #24

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Jun 4, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

Put together a webapp to be used for configuration.

Some of the operations are below:

# HISP administration
 * management of crypto keys for the HISP and health domains
 * choice of root certificates/trust circles
 * adding/deleting endpoint organizations.

# health domain administrators
 * uploading keys for a health domain and for specific endpoints
 * add/remove endpoint addresses (or allow for globs, e.g. "xray-*" for pattern matching)
 * allow additional root certificates/trust circles/self-signed certs.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by bgran...@harris.com on 23 Aug 2010 at 2:40

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Does this include porting the C# implementation schema and a configuration 
service implementation or are those being handled elsewhere?   

I'm willing to take this on, starting with the above-mentioned items.

Original comment by ppyette@gmail.com on 24 Aug 2010 at 4:53

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Umesh is setting up a call to discuss schema.  It was mentioned in today's 
reference implementation meeting that we need to have a dialog around 
configuration.  There will be differences in the configuration data just 
because the underlying implementations are using different technologies, but 
I'm sure we can come up with a common schema from both the storage and services 
perspective.

Original comment by abarea...@gmail.com on 24 Aug 2010 at 5:48

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

It does seem that we still need discussion the data, storage, schema, etc. I'll 
make sure to make you all aware of the meeting information so you are able to 
participate.

It the meantime, it would be useful just to get a skeleton webapp stood up and 
checked into the baseline. From there, we can modify as necessary once we agree 
on that layer.

Original comment by bgran...@harris.com on 24 Aug 2010 at 5:59

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

hmmm... not sure why my other alias is showing up as my user name ;>)

The SmtpAgent has been updated to take a URL for the configuration location.  
This could be an XML file, LDAP location, JDBC connection string (maybe), etc.  
I'm mainly concerned if there are specifics to the configuration schema that 
only enabled the MS SMTP server.  My guy tells me no, but I have yet to look at 
the schema.

Original comment by abarea...@gmail.com on 24 Aug 2010 at 8:22

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

We're at a point where this can be considered complete. Closing.

Original comment by bgran...@harris.com on 21 Oct 2010 at 2:57

  • Changed state: Fixed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant