You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In section 1.6 on newton method, in the 2D implementation the julia code doesn't match the latex equations.
The new approximation is defined to be x1 = x0 + δ, but in the julia function it's written as return x0 - δ.
This works in the code because in the definition of δthe minus sign is also missing, so practically it doesn't matter (they cancel out). However, I think it would be more intuitive if the code matched the latex equations
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In section 1.6 on newton method, in the 2D implementation the julia code doesn't match the latex equations.
The new approximation is defined to be
x1 = x0 + δ
, but in the julia function it's written asreturn x0 - δ
.This works in the code because in the definition of
δ
the minus sign is also missing, so practically it doesn't matter (they cancel out). However, I think it would be more intuitive if the code matched the latex equationsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: