Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Too much false fake face detection #3

Open
Vadim2S opened this issue Sep 27, 2021 · 6 comments
Open

Too much false fake face detection #3

Vadim2S opened this issue Sep 27, 2021 · 6 comments

Comments

@Vadim2S
Copy link

Vadim2S commented Sep 27, 2021

For example: attached image. My cat with melon. Original photo, slightly unfocused. Please, ignore all text
Cat_with_Melon_ orig _ test
.

@CauchyComplete
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi,
Thanks for your false-positive example report. Future works may focus more on images containing a relatively bright object compared to other regions, as your example suggests.
Image manipulation detection is an ongoing research field and it is a very challenging task. I recommend you to compare the outputs with other state-of-the-art forgery detectors, such as ManTra-Net, Noiseprint, EXIF-SC. Public forensic dataset results say CAT-Net overperforms current best approaches.
Thank you.

@Vadim2S
Copy link
Author

Vadim2S commented Sep 27, 2021

Those project are dead. Python 3.5 and Tensorflow 1.8 required too much work just for launch. Cat-Net do good result, except:

  1. "Magic wand" like tool removal. I am attach Spain picture with building crane at end of channel. In air it removed with "magic wand" but you can see it mirroring in water.
  2. Shape alternation. I am attach Proportion picture with instagramm body alternation. You can see difference.
    Both cases do not detected at all
    Proportion_ test
    Spain_ test
    .

@CauchyComplete
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for your good analysis. However, please keep in mind that CAT-Net targeted splicing and copy-move forgeries. You know, CAT-Net mainly uses compression artifacts to detect splicings or copy-moves since pasted regions will likely be misaligned with the original image. Object removal like 'magic wand' and shape alternation forgeries are indeed very popular manipulation in real-world scenarios, but those types of forgeries were not used to train CAT-Net. This was mainly due to a lack of those types of datasets. Building a network that can detect those manipulations jointly with copy-pasting would be nice work though. ☺️

@dan326326
Copy link

Those project are dead. Python 3.5 and Tensorflow 1.8 required too much work just for launch. Cat-Net do good result, except:

  1. "Magic wand" like tool removal. I am attach Spain picture with building crane at end of channel. In air it removed with "magic wand" but you can see it mirroring in water.
  2. Shape alternation. I am attach Proportion picture with instagramm body alternation. You can see difference.
    Both cases do not detected at all
    Proportion_ test
    Spain_ test
    .

Hi, what data set are you using

@Vadim2S
Copy link
Author

Vadim2S commented Nov 10, 2021

Sorry, it is my own small dataset with 5-10 typical fake examples for each type alteration (insert, delete, alter) and each type instrument (Paint, Photoshop, Neural-Net). Nothing private but too unorganized for share.

@dan326326
Copy link

dan326326 commented Nov 10, 2021 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants