Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

+ make now reacts to changes in source files #11

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 28, 2015

Conversation

Fuco1
Copy link
Contributor

@Fuco1 Fuco1 commented Jun 28, 2015

  • missing dependencies for auxiliary programs are solved

+ missing dependencies for auxiliary programs are solved
mk270 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2015
+ make now reacts to changes in source files
@mk270 mk270 merged commit 19a103d into mk270:master Jun 28, 2015
@mk270
Copy link
Owner

mk270 commented Jun 28, 2015

Cheers

@Fuco1
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fuco1 commented Jun 28, 2015

This took me more time than I hoped, but I already have some time booked for the next week... I'm going to dig into the parse package.

@mk270
Copy link
Owner

mk270 commented Jun 28, 2015

thanks - I shall see how much I can get it tidied up before then; documenting the overall organisation of the code would also be useful, but yeah, parse.adb is the epicentre of the cleanup efforts (from my perspective)

having anothe pair of shoulders and eyeballs pressing against this is really appreciated!

@mk270
Copy link
Owner

mk270 commented Jun 28, 2015

BTW, please confirm (or deny) that you're happy for your contributions to be distributed under the same terms as the programme itself.

@Fuco1
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fuco1 commented Jun 28, 2015

Sure. Though I would prefer it be GPLd but I don't think we can do that.

@mk270
Copy link
Owner

mk270 commented Jun 28, 2015

Thanks!

@Fuco1 Fuco1 deleted the better-makefile branch June 28, 2015 20:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants