Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Microsites in website search results need a resource type #141

Closed
varnum opened this issue Oct 23, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

Microsites in website search results need a resource type #141

varnum opened this issue Oct 23, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@varnum
Copy link
Collaborator

varnum commented Oct 23, 2017

Microsites show up without a 'type', so aren't represented in filters. See, e.g., https://search-staging.www.lib.umich.edu/librarywebsite?query=grenada, in which there are two results, with only one represented in the filter:
screen shot 2017-10-23 at 2 12 49 pm

@jonearley
Copy link
Contributor

This is a feature request, not a bug. Microsites wasn't asked to be a type based on the spec:

Filters

  • Webpages
  • Exhibits and Events
  • Blogs and Blog Posts
  • Research Guides
  • Staff Directory / People

From spec: https://docs.google.com/document/d/16e4tU6rPuc--wvToz-JEBnDwckHl9Lm_8sb0PJpceyc/edit#heading=h.li2hwr9cky4d

This is a task for @bertrama to make available to the UI.

@jonearley
Copy link
Contributor

Does our internal name microsites make sense to use as a UI label? Or would webpages or something else make more sense here? @heidisb

@heidisb
Copy link
Collaborator

heidisb commented Oct 23, 2017

Nope. Definitely doesn't make sense as a UI label. My assumption is that they would be part of the Website type. They are really an extension of the primary website.

@varnum
Copy link
Collaborator Author

varnum commented Oct 23, 2017

Adding them to the "Website" resource type is fine with me.

@bertrama
Copy link
Member

bertrama commented Nov 8, 2017

Moved to SEARCH-75.

@bertrama bertrama closed this as completed Nov 8, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants