Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Optional DPM to NetCDF files #15

Closed
john-science opened this issue Feb 13, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Add Optional DPM to NetCDF files #15

john-science opened this issue Feb 13, 2018 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@john-science
Copy link
Collaborator

Users may want DPM in their NetCDF files for toxics studies.

@maybuhleen
Copy link
Contributor

Stage 1 update complete: PM10/PM2.5 EMFAC totals read from csv files, speciated 1:1 (like CO), and written as a model species to NetCDF. PM10/PM2.5 are treated as separate pollutant groups and are independent of PM (PM and PM species will still be processed independent of PM10/PM2.5).

@john-science
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I think your code changes include the word "toxics". But maybe they shouldn't.

I hope ESTA can already process toxics, because that would just be a normal ESTA run with different speciation. But we should check that works.

If so, probably your code should use a term more like "DPM" than "toxics".

@maybuhleen
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, you're right. I'll update the code changes and notes I made to reflect it as a DPM option, not toxics.

@maybuhleen
Copy link
Contributor

DPM/DPM10/DPM2.5 added to text outputs as well as netCDFs. "toxics" option now identified as "dpm" option in config files. See "20170918" version (and later) of ESTA packages for this functionality.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants