-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Optional DPM to NetCDF files #15
Comments
Stage 1 update complete: PM10/PM2.5 EMFAC totals read from csv files, speciated 1:1 (like CO), and written as a model species to NetCDF. PM10/PM2.5 are treated as separate pollutant groups and are independent of PM (PM and PM species will still be processed independent of PM10/PM2.5). |
I think your code changes include the word "toxics". But maybe they shouldn't. I hope ESTA can already process toxics, because that would just be a normal ESTA run with different speciation. But we should check that works. If so, probably your code should use a term more like "DPM" than "toxics". |
Yes, you're right. I'll update the code changes and notes I made to reflect it as a DPM option, not toxics. |
DPM/DPM10/DPM2.5 added to text outputs as well as netCDFs. "toxics" option now identified as "dpm" option in config files. See "20170918" version (and later) of ESTA packages for this functionality. |
Users may want DPM in their NetCDF files for toxics studies.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: