You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Jean-Remi KING and Jean-Remi King are separate entries
Valerii and Valerii Chirkov
PAB and Pierre-Antoine Bannier
Jordan Drew and Drew, J.
Deleted user still shows up (even though it's trying to be excluded in update_credit_rst.py)
Something I think we discussed before, but I can't recall what was decided:
there are some folks who I'm pretty sure are in our .mailmap but their usernames aren't getting parsed out here (TzionaN, Sena, and Martin are a few examples I noticed; probably there are more). Did we decide not to use .mailmap for some reason? Or is it a bug that these users aren't getting the preferred name displayed?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Regarding names when things were ambiguous I think I tried to side with names.inc. There are three potential sources of truth: that, GitHub profile, and .mailmap. I figure mailmap is most remote from the users (maintained by us) so we should probably try to make it match the other two (esp. names.inc since users typically had to make a conscious choice at time of contribution for that) but not 100% sure.
Some possible deduplications:
Jean-Remi KING
andJean-Remi King
are separate entriesValerii
andValerii Chirkov
PAB
andPierre-Antoine Bannier
Jordan Drew
andDrew, J.
Deleted user
still shows up (even though it's trying to be excluded inupdate_credit_rst.py
)Something I think we discussed before, but I can't recall what was decided:
.mailmap
but their usernames aren't getting parsed out here (TzionaN
,Sena
, andMartin
are a few examples I noticed; probably there are more). Did we decide not to use.mailmap
for some reason? Or is it a bug that these users aren't getting the preferred name displayed?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: