New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Q: why eletrode positions plot is different from other tools like Fieldtrip? #4880
Comments
iraquitan
changed the title
Why eletrode positions plot is different from other tools like Fieldtrip?
Q: why eletrode positions plot is different from other tools like Fieldtrip?
Jan 18, 2018
it seems like the outlines parameter from http://martinos.org/mne/
stable/generated/mne.Evoked.html#mne.Evoked.plot_topomap is not exposed in
plot_montage
we could add this yes...
|
I remember having discussed this before - wasn't it related to a transform from some coordinate space to another (based on the fiducials) that isn't done? I can't find the relevant issue though. |
Yes this is probably a dup of #3987 |
6 tasks
11 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
In the Wikipedia 10–20 system (EEG) the electrode positions when plotting are much like the following image (EEG1010.lay) extracted from Fieldtrip, where the midline (T9 -- Cz -- T10) is definitely a straight line.
But in MNE when I plot the standard montage like the following:
I end up with this plot (standard_1020) where the (T9 -- Cz -- T10) line is curved down.
Why there's this difference? And there are any implications on topomap visualizations?
Thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: