Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Carry #25134: Remove join-tokens from the /info API #25145

Merged

Conversation

aaronlehmann
Copy link
Contributor

join-tokens are not needed for this endpoint, and should not be as part of /info

per #24492 (comment)

join-tokens are not needed for this endpoint, and should not be as part
of /info

Signed-off-by: Aaron Lehmann <aaron.lehmann@docker.com>
@aaronlehmann
Copy link
Contributor Author

aaronlehmann commented Jul 27, 2016

Note that this is opened against bump_v1.12.0, so it MUST be cherry-picked to master. I was asked to open the PR this way, but I'm not sure who's responsible for taking care of this. In general, I think it's much better to be consistent about the workflow for getting PRs into releases. If changes can flow in both directions, it's very easy to make mistakes.

@thaJeztah
Copy link
Member

LGTM, thanks!

@vdemeester
Copy link
Member

LGTM 👼
/cc @tiborvass

@tiborvass
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@vieux
Copy link
Contributor

vieux commented Jul 27, 2016

LGTM

@tiborvass
Copy link
Contributor

tiborvass commented Jul 27, 2016

@aaronlehmann can you check the win2lin failure? it feels unrelated but legitly weird:

20:36:09 vendor\src\github.com\docker\distribution\registry\api\errcode\register.go:74: undefined: http.StatusTooManyRequests

EDIT: a node that was in maintenance was enabled, it was supposed to have Go upgraded to 1.6.

@tiborvass tiborvass merged commit 1f33c33 into moby:bump_v1.12.0 Jul 27, 2016
@aaronlehmann aaronlehmann deleted the remove-join-tokens-from-info branch July 27, 2016 21:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants