Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open points before promotion #13

Open
4 of 7 tasks
daKmoR opened this issue Jan 7, 2021 · 5 comments
Open
4 of 7 tasks

Open points before promotion #13

daKmoR opened this issue Jan 7, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@daKmoR
Copy link
Member

daKmoR commented Jan 7, 2021

We still need to fix those things before we want more users to pick rocket up

  • support image relative paths in foo.md files
  • auto generate social media images
  • write OK-ish documentation
  • linting of urls (i.e. check for 404s, broken links, so there are no bad urls)
  • have basic optimization for css (e.g. combine all css files)
  • image filter with responsive sizes as output (e.g. <picture> support)
  • have a naming convention for templates files of presets (especially for @rocket/launch)
@petecarapetyan
Copy link

petecarapetyan commented Jan 7, 2021

If I am understanding the nature of this issue:

  • free of non-standard dependencies like frameworks
  • ability to theme without entanglements
  • pure raw speed and lighthouse score
  • shortest/easiest path to new content

@daKmoR
Copy link
Member Author

daKmoR commented Jan 12, 2021

all 11ty input templates are now supported 💪 (e.g. we rewrite relative links and image sources via html processing instead of within the markdown processor)

@abdonrd
Copy link
Contributor

abdonrd commented Jan 13, 2021

What do you think about a template/starter kit? Something with npm init/npx?
To start a Rocket project faster.

@daKmoR
Copy link
Member Author

daKmoR commented Jan 18, 2021

Finally, link validation is there 💪 (was quite some work 😅)

@abdonrd yeah potentially... maybe start with an github template... and later add something to npm init (we have the system from open-wc init but that probably would need a little improvement 🤔)

@daKmoR
Copy link
Member Author

daKmoR commented Feb 2, 2021

with joiningBlocks we have a nice system which is way better then just a naming convention 💪

another point done ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants