Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
CC @bdemers |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
If properties don't work, you might want to consider XML? It's also part of the JDK. Assuming you're not shipping with jlink (which doesn't make such sense with uber jars, imho), the footprint is the same but the format is much clearer. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Here's a set of ideas for future features:
For item No. 3 the assumption is that everything is local so there's no need to include ShrinkWrap dependencies. JCommander would also be redundant as the launcher knows where the application descriptor is. Next, the descriptor's format. We currently support YAML and TOML via external dependencies. In order to minimize the launcher's footprint a different format would be needed. It could simply be
.properties
. The trick would be automatic conversion from YAML/TOML to.properties
during packaging. This of course would be handled by a Layrry helper as well.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions