Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Chandler] Add an FPM docker image #7101

Closed
slifty opened this issue Jan 4, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

[Chandler] Add an FPM docker image #7101

slifty opened this issue Jan 4, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@slifty
Copy link

slifty commented Jan 4, 2024

How to use GitHub

  • Please use the 👍 reaction to show that you are interested into the same feature.
  • Please don't comment if you have no relevant information to add. It's just extra noise for everyone subscribed to this issue.
  • Subscribe to receive notifications on status change and new comments.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Monica provided an FPM docker image, which allowed me to set up my own reverse proxy. This is useful for https but also in my case I'm using Synology DSM which runs on a very old host kernel / can't run apache-based docker containers.

Describe the solution you'd like
Could the chandler build also be set up to publish an FPM version of the image, the way Monica does?

Describe alternatives you've considered (optional)
I believe the alternative would be for end users to build their own docker images.

Additional context
None.

@djaiss
Copy link
Member

djaiss commented May 23, 2024

@asbiin what do you think of this? I know nothing of Docker and image building.

@slifty
Copy link
Author

slifty commented May 23, 2024

Actually I think in the most recent docker release has a 5.0 FPM image: https://hub.docker.com/layers/library/monica/5.0.0-beta-fpm-alpine/images/sha256-b6bf043c29c739b39cc9a485074f52df1b568c9fae9cb4703b7a66c69ea389ce?context=explore

So I can mark this as closed (also since opening this issue I learned that there is the docker repo and I should have opened it there).

@slifty slifty closed this as completed May 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants