Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

choose VID/PID for bootloader & TTY interface #37

Closed
trentgill opened this issue Jan 23, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

choose VID/PID for bootloader & TTY interface #37

trentgill opened this issue Jan 23, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
design Issue needs design consideration enhancement New feature or request
Milestone
1.0.0

Comments

@trentgill
Copy link
Collaborator

need to choose VID/PID and device name so it's more easily recognizable to the end-user (currently looks like a generic stm32 dfu bootloader).
@trentgill trentgill added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 23, 2019
@trentgill trentgill added this to the 1 milestone Jan 23, 2019
@trentgill
Copy link
Collaborator Author

manufacturer string & product name are updated.

potentially we can find a usb vid/pid pair to ride on to avoid appearing as an 'stm32 device'.
note: presently the TTY interface appears as 'usbmodem1441' on macs. unsure if this is static across machines, or dynamically allocated somehow?

@tehn
Copy link
Member

tehn commented Jan 26, 2019

i haven't looked into vid/pid pairs recently but years ago it was not so great. i'm pretty sure STM lets everyone use their vid/pid (just like FTDI) for end products

"stm32 device" is ok by me. it's really the manufacturer string and product name that are important. and yeah, usbmodem... is normal for mac... also ok as i see it.

@trentgill trentgill added the design Issue needs design consideration label Mar 1, 2019
@trentgill trentgill modified the milestones: 1.0, 1.1 Mar 1, 2019
@tehn tehn mentioned this issue Dec 2, 2019
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
design Issue needs design consideration enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.0.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@trentgill @tehn