Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

idea - add support for various kinds of line_of_sight blockers #19

Open
ajuc opened this issue Jun 13, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

idea - add support for various kinds of line_of_sight blockers #19

ajuc opened this issue Jun 13, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@ajuc
Copy link

ajuc commented Jun 13, 2020

Hi, this was a geat idea to add a common format for this.

I'm adding export to this format from my battlemap generator ( https://ajuc.github.io/outdoorsBattlemapGenerator/ ), and I'm wondering if you plan to add support for various kinds of walls (for example river would be "block movement but not vision", and in the future I'd like to add hills (block one way but not the other).

@moo-man
Copy link
Owner

moo-man commented Jun 14, 2020

That seems perfectly doable. But I would think it would belong in a new wall array. Currently there's line_of_sight and portals. If your generator adds anything else I can easily support that too.

@ajuc
Copy link
Author

ajuc commented Jun 20, 2020

Thank you. First I'll try to talk with dungeondraft team to have this added on both tools the same way, if not I'll jut add "walls" field.

@moo-man
Copy link
Owner

moo-man commented Aug 9, 2020

Is your generator currently ready to support these new line of sight blockers? If you could specify them and what they should map to on the Foundry side, I can maybe add them in the future.

@m42e m42e added enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested needs-clarification and removed question Further information is requested labels Oct 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants