You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Obviously, that name is ridiculously unwieldy, but the need stands. We'll want to scale the emitted score of a rule by a constant, automatically, while training (and perhaps in the final, tuned ruleset). Right now, this could be done by interposing a type, but it will probably prove pragmatic to let us do it more concisely. We could either add this complication to the runtime or let the compilation pass interpose a made-up type implicitly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We don't need it! By using a JS-native optimization algorithm like https://github.com/iaroslav-ai/optimization-js, we can basically just wrap a for loop around the ruleset and use native JS variables to add coefficients wherever we want them. Sometimes it's nice to be embedded in a host language. :-)
Obviously, that name is ridiculously unwieldy, but the need stands. We'll want to scale the emitted score of a rule by a constant, automatically, while training (and perhaps in the final, tuned ruleset). Right now, this could be done by interposing a type, but it will probably prove pragmatic to let us do it more concisely. We could either add this complication to the runtime or let the compilation pass interpose a made-up type implicitly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: