Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Shirk my SDK code #605

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Aug 4, 2017
Merged

Conversation

jonathanKingston
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@groovecoder
Copy link
Member

I verified this mostly works, and the most noticeable bugs are already listed in #486. Needs a merge from master to resolve conflicts.

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
const tabPageCounter = {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can remove this ... either now, or in a separate branch to prepare for AMO.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will do later I wasn't sure if we wanted to account for opt in telemetry at any point. Was a little tricky to reengineer this and other telemetry bits (this was pre decision to drop it totally that I did the work) So I would rather leave it in as totally non functioning for now. We could consider supporting telemetry for people who want to help us also.

@jonathanKingston
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kjozwiak looks like you were already assigned anyway

@groovecoder
Copy link
Member

Things still look good. But when I installed this onto my existing 2.4.0 add-on, I lost all my container tabs? 😢

@jonathanKingston
Copy link
Contributor Author

@groovecoder just the tabs or the containers too?

@groovecoder
Copy link
Member

I lose the tabs and the containers. 😢

(Note: in the screen-vid, the first orange tab is in a "Test AMO Update" container, which is then destroyed during the update)

container-tab-loss

@jonathanKingston
Copy link
Contributor Author

@groovecoder I couldn't replicate this when renumbering this to 3.0.0 after rebasing.

My STR was making the two XPIs from master and this branch:

  • about:debugging add old
  • Create some tabs and containers
  • about:debugging add this

@jonathanKingston
Copy link
Contributor Author

@groovecoder I was able to replicate #703 following the same STR from about:addons though

@groovecoder
Copy link
Member

Okay, I re-tried again on 54, 55, 56, and 57 Nightly and I wasn't able to reproduce losing tabs & containers. So I think this is ready as soon as the travis-ci/eslint errors are fixed.

@groovecoder
Copy link
Member

Merged #707 so this needs rebase & eslint fixes then it's ready to go.

@jonathanKingston
Copy link
Contributor Author

@groovecoder should be good to go merged and dead headed the code. I tested my TODO comments I removed, works with less code 👍

@jonathanKingston jonathanKingston changed the title Break my SDK code Shirk my SDK code Aug 4, 2017
Copy link
Member

@groovecoder groovecoder left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good and works well. Let's plan to push this to production on Monday.

@groovecoder groovecoder merged commit ee8c69b into mozilla:master Aug 4, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants