You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am very tempted to depreciate releases for alia-all in favor of forcing users to pick and choose manually what they need. I have had to deal a few times with people blindly getting alia-all and have troubles with transitive deps (ex nippy). This ultimately should not cause trouble to anyone.
right now I can't spec things such as a core.async/channel or manifold deferred because I have no guarantee core.async will be present in the classpath of a user. One solution would be to split specs per "module", either integrated into the module itself, or in a separate modules (for people who still like to use AOT). Not sure about that one yet, but 1 project/module per spec context might be better.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am very tempted to depreciate releases for
alia-all
in favor of forcing users to pick and choose manually what they need. I have had to deal a few times with people blindly getting alia-all and have troubles with transitive deps (ex nippy). This ultimately should not cause trouble to anyone.right now I can't spec things such as a core.async/channel or manifold deferred because I have no guarantee core.async will be present in the classpath of a user. One solution would be to split specs per "module", either integrated into the module itself, or in a separate modules (for people who still like to use AOT). Not sure about that one yet, but 1 project/module per spec context might be better.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: