You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
hai
a refinement that should be made:
the new rule to make the ampc organisms R (or make NA), is based on isolates that show S based on in vitro results. But raw results with 'I' should also be included. Because of the resistance mechanism, these are essentially the same situations.
eucast text that you quote:
'a character value that should be applied for AmpC de-repressed cephalosporin-resistant mutants, defaults to NA. Currently only works when version_expertrules is 3.2; 'EUCAST Expert Rules v3.2 on Enterobacterales' states that susceptible (S) results of cefotaxime, ceftriaxone and ceftazidime should be reported with a note, or results should be suppressed (emptied) for these agents. A value of NA for this argument will remove results for these agents, while e.g. a value of "R" will make the results for these agents resistant.'
does not explicitly state this, but it is ofcourse implied.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
hai
a refinement that should be made:
the new rule to make the ampc organisms R (or make NA), is based on isolates that show S based on in vitro results. But raw results with 'I' should also be included. Because of the resistance mechanism, these are essentially the same situations.
eucast text that you quote:
'a character value that should be applied for AmpC de-repressed cephalosporin-resistant mutants, defaults to NA. Currently only works when version_expertrules is 3.2; 'EUCAST Expert Rules v3.2 on Enterobacterales' states that susceptible (S) results of cefotaxime, ceftriaxone and ceftazidime should be reported with a note, or results should be suppressed (emptied) for these agents. A value of NA for this argument will remove results for these agents, while e.g. a value of "R" will make the results for these agents resistant.'
does not explicitly state this, but it is ofcourse implied.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: