Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fields without setters, including fields that are collections #4

Closed
johnstosh opened this issue Apr 25, 2012 · 1 comment
Closed

fields without setters, including fields that are collections #4

johnstosh opened this issue Apr 25, 2012 · 1 comment

Comments

@johnstosh
Copy link

I have some changes to share back.

This includes a few small bug fixes, but more importantly (1) the processing of fields which do not have setters, (2) using the instantiated pojo when fetching instances of collections from a field, rather than instantiating a new object with a no-arg constructor or such, (3) some JUnit tests.

-John
@johnstosh johnstosh mentioned this issue Apr 27, 2012
Closed
@mtedone
Copy link
Owner

mtedone commented Sep 5, 2012

This has now been fixed

@mtedone mtedone closed this as completed Sep 5, 2012
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@mtedone @johnstosh