Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

<linux/mptcp.h> conflict with <netinet/in.h> in C library #276

Closed
ossama-othman opened this issue May 12, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

<linux/mptcp.h> conflict with <netinet/in.h> in C library #276

ossama-othman opened this issue May 12, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
Projects

Comments

@ossama-othman
Copy link
Member

Including <linux/mptcp.h> before the C library <netinet/in.h> header causes symbol redefinition errors at compile-time due to duplicate declarations and definitions in the <linux/in.h> header included by <linux/mptcp.h>.

The following simple code may be used to reproduce the compile-time errors:

// foo.c
#include <linux/mptcp.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
$ gcc -fsyntax-only foo.c 
In file included from foo.c:2:
/usr/include/netinet/in.h:31:8: error: redefinition of ‘struct in_addr’
   31 | struct in_addr
      |        ^~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/linux/mptcp.h:7,
                 from foo.c:1:
/usr/include/linux/in.h:89:8: note: originally defined here
   89 | struct in_addr {
      |        ^~~~~~~
...
@ossama-othman
Copy link
Member Author

The following patch addresses the problem by forcing <netinet/in.h> to be included before <linux/in.h> so that the C library compatibility in <linux/libc-compat.h> is enabled when including <linux/mptcp.h> in user space code:

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/mptcp.h b/include/uapi/linux/mptcp.h
index 921963589904..dfe19bf13f4c 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/mptcp.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/mptcp.h
@@ -2,16 +2,17 @@
 #ifndef _UAPI_MPTCP_H
 #define _UAPI_MPTCP_H
 
+#ifndef __KERNEL__
+#include <netinet/in.h>                /* for sockaddr_in and sockaddr_in6     */
+#include <sys/socket.h>                /* for struct sockaddr                  */
+#endif
+
 #include <linux/const.h>
 #include <linux/types.h>
 #include <linux/in.h>          /* for sockaddr_in                      */
 #include <linux/in6.h>         /* for sockaddr_in6                     */
 #include <linux/socket.h>      /* for sockaddr_storage and sa_family   */
 
-#ifndef __KERNEL__
-#include <sys/socket.h>                /* for struct sockaddr                  */
-#endif
-
 #define MPTCP_SUBFLOW_FLAG_MCAP_REM            _BITUL(0)
 #define MPTCP_SUBFLOW_FLAG_MCAP_LOC            _BITUL(1)
 #define MPTCP_SUBFLOW_FLAG_JOIN_REM            _BITUL(2)

@matttbe
Copy link
Member

matttbe commented Jun 2, 2022

The patch has been applied in our tree (and sent to net-next)

@matttbe matttbe closed this as completed Jun 2, 2022
MPTCP Bugs automation moved this from Needs triage to Closed Jun 2, 2022
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 5, 2024
…test_init()

The synth_event_gen_test module can be built in, if someone wants to run
the tests at boot up and not have to load them.

The synth_event_gen_test_init() function creates and enables the synthetic
events and runs its tests.

The synth_event_gen_test_exit() disables the events it created and
destroys the events.

If the module is builtin, the events are never disabled. The issue is, the
events should be disable after the tests are run. This could be an issue
if the rest of the boot up tests are enabled, as they expect the events to
be in a known state before testing. That known state happens to be
disabled.

When CONFIG_SYNTH_EVENT_GEN_TEST=y and CONFIG_EVENT_TRACE_STARTUP_TEST=y
a warning will trigger:

 Running tests on trace events:
 Testing event create_synth_test:
 Enabled event during self test!
 ------------[ cut here ]------------
 WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1 at kernel/trace/trace_events.c:4150 event_trace_self_tests+0x1c2/0x480
 Modules linked in:
 CPU: 2 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc2-test-00031-gb803d7c664d5-dirty #276
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
 RIP: 0010:event_trace_self_tests+0x1c2/0x480
 Code: bb e8 a2 ab 5d fc 48 8d 7b 48 e8 f9 3d 99 fc 48 8b 73 48 40 f6 c6 01 0f 84 d6 fe ff ff 48 c7 c7 20 b6 ad bb e8 7f ab 5d fc 90 <0f> 0b 90 48 89 df e8 d3 3d 99 fc 48 8b 1b 4c 39 f3 0f 85 2c ff ff
 RSP: 0000:ffffc9000001fdc0 EFLAGS: 00010246
 RAX: 0000000000000029 RBX: ffff88810399ca80 RCX: 0000000000000000
 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffffb9f19478 RDI: ffff88823c734e64
 RBP: ffff88810399f300 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: fffffbfff79eb32a
 R10: ffffffffbcf59957 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff888104068090
 R13: ffffffffbc89f0a0 R14: ffffffffbc8a0f08 R15: 0000000000000078
 FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88823c700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 00000001f6282001 CR4: 0000000000170ef0
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  ? __warn+0xa5/0x200
  ? event_trace_self_tests+0x1c2/0x480
  ? report_bug+0x1f6/0x220
  ? handle_bug+0x6f/0x90
  ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x50
  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
  ? tracer_preempt_on+0x78/0x1c0
  ? event_trace_self_tests+0x1c2/0x480
  ? __pfx_event_trace_self_tests_init+0x10/0x10
  event_trace_self_tests_init+0x27/0xe0
  do_one_initcall+0xd6/0x3c0
  ? __pfx_do_one_initcall+0x10/0x10
  ? kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30
  ? rcu_is_watching+0x38/0x60
  kernel_init_freeable+0x324/0x450
  ? __pfx_kernel_init+0x10/0x10
  kernel_init+0x1f/0x1e0
  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x33/0x50
  ret_from_fork+0x34/0x60
  ? __pfx_kernel_init+0x10/0x10
  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
  </TASK>

This is because the synth_event_gen_test_init() left the synthetic events
that it created enabled. By having it disable them after testing, the
other selftests will run fine.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20231220111525.2f0f49b0@gandalf.local.home

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>
Fixes: 9fe41ef ("tracing: Add synth event generation test module")
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>
Tested-by: Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 26, 2024
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.5.0-kfd-fkuehlin #276 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/8:2/2676 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff9435aae95c88 ((work_completion)(&svm_bo->eviction_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x52/0x550

but task is already holding lock:
ffff9435cd8e1720 (&svms->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: svm_range_deferred_list_work+0xe8/0x340 [amdgpu]

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #2 (&svms->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock+0x97/0xd30
       kfd_ioctl_alloc_memory_of_gpu+0x6d/0x3c0 [amdgpu]
       kfd_ioctl+0x1b2/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x86/0xc0
       do_syscall_64+0x39/0x80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}:
       down_read+0x42/0x160
       svm_range_evict_svm_bo_worker+0x8b/0x340 [amdgpu]
       process_one_work+0x27a/0x540
       worker_thread+0x53/0x3e0
       kthread+0xeb/0x120
       ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50
       ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20

-> #0 ((work_completion)(&svm_bo->eviction_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       __lock_acquire+0x1426/0x2200
       lock_acquire+0xc1/0x2b0
       __flush_work+0x80/0x550
       __cancel_work_timer+0x109/0x190
       svm_range_bo_release+0xdc/0x1c0 [amdgpu]
       svm_range_free+0x175/0x180 [amdgpu]
       svm_range_deferred_list_work+0x15d/0x340 [amdgpu]
       process_one_work+0x27a/0x540
       worker_thread+0x53/0x3e0
       kthread+0xeb/0x120
       ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50
       ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  (work_completion)(&svm_bo->eviction_work) --> &mm->mmap_lock --> &svms->lock

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&svms->lock);
                               lock(&mm->mmap_lock);
                               lock(&svms->lock);
  lock((work_completion)(&svm_bo->eviction_work));

I believe this cannot really lead to a deadlock in practice, because
svm_range_evict_svm_bo_worker only takes the mmap_read_lock if the BO
refcount is non-0. That means it's impossible that svm_range_bo_release
is running concurrently. However, there is no good way to annotate this.

To avoid the problem, take a BO reference in
svm_range_schedule_evict_svm_bo instead of in the worker. That way it's
impossible for a BO to get freed while eviction work is pending and the
cancel_work_sync call in svm_range_bo_release can be eliminated.

v2: Use svm_bo_ref_unless_zero and explained why that's safe. Also
removed redundant checks that are already done in
amdkfd_fence_enable_signaling.

Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Philip Yang <philip.yang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
No open projects
MPTCP Bugs
  
Closed
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants