Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide a mvnd.noDaemon option to disable daemon for easier debugging #43

Closed
gnodet opened this issue Jul 17, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed
Milestone

Comments

@gnodet
Copy link
Contributor

gnodet commented Jul 17, 2020

It would be useful if we could skip the client/server stuff to more easily debug the daemon.

@ppalaga
Copy link
Contributor

ppalaga commented Jul 29, 2020

How would you implement that given that the native client cannot load classes at runtime? Would that be an option of the existing mvnd shell script? Or perhaps a new script calling the daemon.jar directly?

@gnodet
Copy link
Contributor Author

gnodet commented Jul 29, 2020

The option could be only available for the non native client. The goal is to more easily debug the server side build, so the client is not really important in the scenario.

I've pushed a draft commit I did some time ago, but it wasn't working fully, so that's just an idea : https://github.com/gnodet/mvnd/tree/issue-43

@ppalaga
Copy link
Contributor

ppalaga commented Jul 29, 2020

Makes sense, thanks for the explanation.

gnodet added a commit to gnodet/mvnd that referenced this issue Nov 9, 2020
gnodet added a commit to gnodet/mvnd that referenced this issue Nov 10, 2020
gnodet added a commit to gnodet/mvnd that referenced this issue Nov 11, 2020
@gnodet gnodet closed this as completed in e397627 Nov 11, 2020
@ppalaga ppalaga added this to the 0.0.12 milestone Nov 12, 2020
@gnodet gnodet changed the title Provide a mvnd.daemon option to disable daemon for easier debugging Provide a mvnd.noDaemon option to disable daemon for easier debugging May 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants