You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Does MPB cite any papers that describe how it formulates and discretizes its operator of which it finds the eigenvalues?
Several papers take common Maxwell operator formulations and "upgrade" them (or modify them) to enable lossy materials or even materials with perfectly matched boundary layers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In principle, similar techniques can be used for lossy media, with the caveats that:
Lossy media make the operator non-Hermitian, requiring completely different eigensolver techniques and a different way of describing the eigenvalues you want. ("Lowest bands" is not applicable any more.)
Realistic lossy media are often dispersive, transforming it into a nonlinear eigenproblem. (Of course, if the frequency dependence is a rational function, you can transform it into a polynomial eigenproblem and from there back into a linear eigenproblem, but it is still messier).
Weakly lossy materials can often be handled via perturbation theory (with MPB computing the lossless solutions). Strongly lossly materials like metals really call for a different discretization scheme that can employ nonuniform grids, like FEM or BEM.
Does MPB cite any papers that describe how it formulates and discretizes its operator of which it finds the eigenvalues?
Several papers take common Maxwell operator formulations and "upgrade" them (or modify them) to enable lossy materials or even materials with perfectly matched boundary layers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: