Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fuzzer doesn't account for the fact that Lighttpd ignores empty header values #23

Open
kenballus opened this issue Feb 8, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Fuzzer doesn't account for the fact that Lighttpd ignores empty header values #23

kenballus opened this issue Feb 8, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@kenballus
Copy link
Collaborator

this could use a normalization
@gstrauss
Copy link

gstrauss commented Feb 8, 2024

Yes, for simplicity, lighttpd ignores empty request headers.
(Previously discussed in https://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/3219#note-4)

@kenballus
Copy link
Collaborator Author

kenballus commented Feb 8, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Yes; I should have made the text of this bug clearer. This is a bug in the Garden that causes unimportant discrepancies to be reported because Lighttpd ignores empty headers, not a bug in Lighttpd that needs to be fixed.

@kenballus kenballus added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 14, 2024
@kenballus kenballus changed the title [BUG] Lighttpd target ignores empty header values Fuzzer doesn't account for the fact that Lighttpd ignores empty header values Feb 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@gstrauss @kenballus