You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Unsure whether to classify this as a bug as it may be intended behavior, but in my opinion it can lead to confusion.
When calling updateSpan (c span [args] in ltpadmin), if the lsoCommand of span is changed, a new process is not launch for the new lsoCommand. In my opinion, if there is a change in the lsoCommand, the current process running the now defunct lsoCommand should be stopped and a new one should be started. The current behavior is that the defunct lsoCommand process hangs around until the span is restarted manually or by some other means.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Unsure whether to classify this as a bug as it may be intended behavior, but in my opinion it can lead to confusion.
When calling updateSpan (c span [args] in ltpadmin), if the lsoCommand of span is changed, a new process is not launch for the new lsoCommand. In my opinion, if there is a change in the lsoCommand, the current process running the now defunct lsoCommand should be stopped and a new one should be started. The current behavior is that the defunct lsoCommand process hangs around until the span is restarted manually or by some other means.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: