Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ProcessInstrumentUncertainties.py TriOS FRM-Class #71

Closed
oceancolorcoder opened this issue Aug 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

ProcessInstrumentUncertainties.py TriOS FRM-Class #71

oceancolorcoder opened this issue Aug 21, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@oceancolorcoder
Copy link
Contributor

Fails on similar broadcast error to SeaBird, but at a different location:

File "/Users/daurin/GitRepos/HyperCP/Source/ProcessL2.py", line 1690, in ensemblesReflectance
xSlice.update(instrument.Default(uncGroup, stats)) # update the xSlice dict with uncertianties and samples
File "/Users/daurin/GitRepos/HyperCP/Source/ProcessInstrumentUncertainties.py", line 137, in Default
ES_unc, LI_unc, LT_unc, ES_rel, LI_rel, LT_rel = PropagateL1B.propagate_Instrument_Uncertainty(mean_values,
File "/Users/daurin/GitRepos/HyperCP/Source/Uncertainty_Analysis.py", line 63, in propagate_Instrument_Uncertainty
sensor = self.instruments(mean_vals)
File "/Users/daurin/GitRepos/HyperCP/Source/Uncertainty_Analysis.py", line 185, in instruments
return np.array((ESLIGHT - ESDARK)ESCalESStab
ESLinESStrayEST*ESCos),
ValueError: operands could not be broadcast together with shapes (208,) (10,)

@juanchossn
Copy link

Not popping up anylonger after new PR.

Proposed for closure

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants