Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use Generated Stubs #83

Closed
3 tasks done
jphickey opened this issue Mar 28, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #84
Closed
3 tasks done

Use Generated Stubs #83

jphickey opened this issue Mar 28, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #84
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@jphickey
Copy link
Contributor

Checklist (Please check before submitting)

  • I reviewed the Contributing Guide.
  • I reviewed the README file to see if the feature is in the major future work.
  • I performed a cursory search to see if the feature request is relevant, not redundant, nor in conflict with other tickets.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
LC unit testing currently uses a set of stubs for its internal units that are not generated by the tool

Describe the solution you'd like
Use the generated stubs directly whenever possible, as this makes future maintenance easier - when an API changes, just re-run the generator tool to update the stubs.

Additional context
This requires some additional separation of items - global variable stubs should be in a separate compilation unit, as the tool does not generate these.

Requester Info
Joseph Hickey, Vantage Systems, Inc.

@jphickey jphickey self-assigned this Mar 28, 2023
jphickey added a commit to jphickey/LC that referenced this issue Mar 28, 2023
Separate the global variables into separate stub source units, then
re-run the stub generator for all internal APIs. The committed result
here is the exact output of the tool, unmodified.
dzbaker added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 30, 2023
@dmknutsen dmknutsen added this to the Equuleus milestone May 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants