-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 216
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix warnings in OSAL "unit-test" code #30
Comments
Imported from trac issue 7. Created by jphickey on 2014-12-30T11:27:04, last modified: 2015-11-20T16:22:16 |
Trac comment by glimes on 2015-01-29 15:11:51: Click [changeset:530734e here] to see the changeset. |
Trac comment by glimes on 2015-01-29 16:35:51: I have reviewed [changeset:530734e changeset 530734e] and recommend ACCEPT after one potential problem is resolved. Potential problem:
Important side benefits of the included changes:
New things required of target platorms:
|
Trac comment by mlogan on 2015-01-30 18:49:38: So my diff of this branch to the master branch shows many more changes. Compile-time select-able code was introduced, but it is unclear as to how "warnings" were addressed by this. Would like a little more detail. namely.. +#ifdef OSAL_UNIT_TEST
Additionally, ut_osloader_stubs.c had a block of code removed as well. -#ifdef OS_INCLUDE_MODULE_LOADER
|
Trac comment by jphickey on 2015-01-30 21:38:10: Regarding the {{{#ifdef OSAL_UNIT_TEST}}} bits: At the entry point in all of these tests there was already a conditional compile such as this: {{{ However at the end of the function there was an unconditional: This produced a warning about returning with a value from a void function in the case that the OSAL_UNIT_TEST was defined and the OS_Application_Startup() function declaration was used. In this case it is changed to calling OS_Application_Exit() (the new function) and the return statement is removed which clears up the warning. In both cases the return/exit code now indicates the test pass/fail status where it was previously just 0. This bit of the change is not strictly a warning fix. One could argue that this return value modification better fits in trac #29, but this would end up as a merge conflict when trying to put them back together again, so I just included it in this changeset that was already touching that line. |
Trac comment by jphickey on 2015-01-30 22:12:48: As for the removal of the {{{OS_module_table}}} variables from ut_osloader_stubs.c, these were simply unused variables. It is not a warning per se, just some clean up. Not sure what the history of these were and why they needed to be provided by the osloader stub at one time. If anyone has concerns about the removal of that block in ut_osloader_stubs.c then that one file can be reverted out of this changeset. However given that this is a unit test (not runtime code) and the fact that the compiler/linker tends to be really good at finding uninstantiated variables, one can be fairly sure that these were unreferenced variables. |
Trac comment by jphickey on 2015-01-30 22:28:54: Regarding the original note by Greg about aVAR on Line 99 -- good catch. The current build did not define OS_LOG_TO_STDOUT_TOO but this was indeed a problem when this is defined. I have fixed this and confirmed the build now works when the OS_LOG_TO_STDOUT_TOO macro is defined. This brings up another topic of conversation on whether to use "git commit --amend" or simply create a new commit on this branch to fix this up. I generally advocate for cleaner version history and use "git commit --amend" and "git push -f" when this type of after-the-fact patch comes up. But the side effect is that the commitid will change and the link posted earlier will break. |
Trac comment by jphickey on 2015-01-30 22:34:31: Amended commit has been pushed. The new commit is [changeset:6d3b3aa]. I also modified the log message to mention the return value change when OSAL_UNIT_TEST is defined. |
Trac comment by glimes on 2015-02-02 14:26:47: Updated changeset looks good; I recommend ACCEPT. ( On the "to amend or not to amend" question: amend made it harder to find how the proposed changesets differed, but you really need an amend if you are editing the log message to clarify, as a log message in a child commit talking about something in the parent commit is also confusing. I use amend too much, so I recuse myself from making any kind of recommendation here ... ) |
Trac comment by jwilmot on 2015-02-11 14:25:48: Seems benign, ACCEPT |
Trac comment by acudmore on 2015-02-11 14:53:32: Looks good, ACCEPT. |
Trac comment by glimes on 2015-02-12 14:58:25: Accepted by #41 for integration candidate. |
Trac comment by glimes on 2015-03-04 15:13:15: Confirmed that the fix from [changeset:6d3b3aa] is present in the https://babelfish.arc.nasa.gov/bamboo/browse/CFS-CFSOSAL |
The code in the "unit-tests" directory in OSAL has a number of warnings when it compiles and this is one thing preventing turning on the strictest compiler settings (-Wall -Werror, etc) during the build.
Many of the warnings are related to passing a non-const string directly to a printf function when logging test results.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: