Is it better to set the same crop size for both pretraining and downstream finetuning?

[DY-ATL]

Hello, I notice that the setting of habitat image generation is

256x256 resolution images, with 60 degrees field of view

When compared to the image used for downstream finetuning, there are two differences:

1. The focal length fx is quite small (fx = (256 - 1) / 2 / tan(radians(60 / 2)) = 220.84), which is much smaller than SceneFlow's fx=1050.0.
2. The crop size is much smaller than stereo's [352, 704].

I wonder will it better to increase the crop size to match the downstream? Or it doesn't matter due to the relative positional embedding?

[PhilippeWeinzaepfel]

Hi,

For pre-training, we indeed use 256x256 images (both for habitat and real image pairs) from which we extract 224x224 crops.

What we find the most important for downstream tasks is to both train and test at the same resolution, even if different from pre-training. This is why we use a tiling-based approach for stereo/flow at test time. While relative positional embedding helps, it is not enough to generalize to any resolution at test time.

Overall, specially once real image pairs are included, the pre-training should be effective irrespectively of the focals or resolution of the downstream tasks. Pre-training at higher resolution is likely to be better but it would be slow( DINOv2 actually did pre-train first at 224x224 before doing a second step at larger resolution, and a similar strategy could be used there if needed).

Best
Philippe

[DY-ATL]

Thank you for your answer!