The package.json license field does not reflect LICENSE-MIT

[SmileyJames]

this
"license": "(MIT OR GPL-3.0)",
https://github.com/nbubna/store/blob/master/package.json#L32

seems at odds with:
https://github.com/nbubna/store/blob/master/LICENSE-MIT

GPL 3 is very different to MIT, it is copyleft
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html

[nbubna]

Since you probably closed this because you found the answer, this is redundant for you. But in case others wonder, the answer is that as creator I (and ESHA) can provide the software under any number of licenses we choose. In a lot of ways, specifying both GPL 3 and MIT seems contradictory, but the intent is to offer this under the "do whatever you want, as long as we're not liable" plan so you can use this in any stack, without legal considerations.