Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support multiple vm and storage checks #5

Open
nbuchwitz opened this issue Apr 7, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Support multiple vm and storage checks #5

nbuchwitz opened this issue Apr 7, 2018 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@nbuchwitz
Copy link
Owner

The check command should support more than one resource name parameter, to allow checks for more than one storage or vm per check execution.

@nbuchwitz nbuchwitz added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 7, 2018
@nbuchwitz nbuchwitz added this to the 1.0.1 milestone Apr 7, 2018
@nbuchwitz nbuchwitz self-assigned this Apr 7, 2018
@nbuchwitz nbuchwitz modified the milestones: 1.0.1, 1.1.0 Apr 9, 2018
@nbuchwitz nbuchwitz removed this from the 1.1.0 milestone Sep 25, 2018
@fulljackz
Copy link

Hi,

Is there any news about this feature ? I do not think so.
It would be a very good thing to get metrics for all running vms, dynamically.

I am going to try something in the script.

@nbuchwitz
Copy link
Owner Author

Unfortunately no news about this, but it is still on the agenda.

@hamapj
Copy link

hamapj commented Dec 31, 2023

Hi, is there any progress about this?

I would highly appreciate the idea mentioned by @fulljackz to be able to dynamically retriev metrics, maybe via specifing the resource type?

I already took a look at the code and would gladly create a PR for this.

@nbuchwitz
Copy link
Owner Author

No, haven't had any capacity for this. Happy to review a pr and collaborate on the integration.

@hamapj
Copy link

hamapj commented Jan 17, 2024

I have created a PR here for this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants