Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make encoders probeable on ensembles #1117

Closed
tbekolay opened this issue Jul 4, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

Make encoders probeable on ensembles #1117

tbekolay opened this issue Jul 4, 2016 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@tbekolay
Copy link
Member

tbekolay commented Jul 4, 2016

Right now, to probe changing encoders, you probe a Voja learning rule object. However, since encoders 'belong' to ensembles, it makes more more sense to probe them on an ensemble rather than the learning rule. We should make it possible to probe encoders on ensembles (for the same reason we can probe the weights on connections).

@drasmuss drasmuss assigned drasmuss and unassigned drasmuss Aug 8, 2016
@bmorcos bmorcos self-assigned this Sep 1, 2016
@bmorcos
Copy link
Contributor

bmorcos commented Sep 6, 2016

Once encoders are probeable directly from the ensembles do we want to keep encoders probeable from the learning rule as well or remove that?

Encoders probeable from ensemble & learning rule
Encoders probeable from only ensemble

@drasmuss
Copy link
Member

drasmuss commented Sep 6, 2016

I should mention, I implemented this for a different PR (#553, see commit 4a572c3). I just added probing to the ensemble (leaving the learning rule as is), but I think it'd probably make sense to remove it from the learning rule. I also didn't test that change at all, just tried it out for the specific use case in that PR.

@shrutisneha2011
Copy link

how can we check the synaptic weights in nengo @drasmuss kindly reply

@drasmuss
Copy link
Member

Hi @shrutisneha2011. The best way to get help with modelling questions is to post them on https://forum.nengo.ai/

@shrutisneha2011
Copy link

Thank you so much Sir for your reply. It really means a lot, i tried so far
reaching you but failed.

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Daniel Rasmussen notifications@github.com
wrote:

Hi @shrutisneha2011 https://github.com/shrutisneha2011. The best way to
get help with modelling questions is to post them on
https://forum.nengo.ai/


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#1117 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQ_ZbmpHqzxzITvvim5amu-3qwgNjssxks5qpUMOgaJpZM4JEQ1I
.

@bmorcos bmorcos closed this as completed Nov 25, 2016
@nengo nengo deleted a comment from shrutisneha2011 Jan 23, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants