Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Node functions get t as float, x as readonly #628

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 21, 2015
Merged

Node functions get t as float, x as readonly #628

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 21, 2015

Conversation

hunse
Copy link
Collaborator

@hunse hunse commented Jan 21, 2015

Node functions now receive t as a float (as opposed to a
zero-dimensional array), and x as a readonly view onto the
simulator data. This addresses #626.

@jgosmann
Copy link
Collaborator

LGTM 🍰

@tbekolay
Copy link
Member

Me too; merging!

Node functions now receive `t` as a float (as opposed to a
zero-dimensional array), and `x` as a readonly view onto the
simulator data. This addresses #626.
@tbekolay
Copy link
Member

Amended in a changelog entry.

My thought process (which I want to make sure matches other people's) is that every PR should have a corresponding changelog entry; there's a bit of worry that we're duplicating info that is in the commit messages, but changelog entries should always be one line, with a pointer to the issue / PR that introduced the fix / feature. That way the bulk of the info (if people care) is in the commit message / issue / PR discussion, while the changelog makes sure that we don't have to scramble to say what's new in each version. Any objections to that?

@hunse
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hunse commented Jan 21, 2015

No, that sounds like a good idea. I'll try to remember to put those in. I think it's also not necessarily a bad thing to do them at the end of a PR (when it's clear what the actual changes are) as opposed to the beginning, but the best is probably to put something in at the beginning and then edit it as need be.

@tbekolay
Copy link
Member

Yeah, actually this is perhaps more appropriately a job for the merger rather than the author (though the author should feel free to add one if they choose). But just wanted to make sure tracking these is OK!

@hunse
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hunse commented Jan 21, 2015

Yeah, it's nice to have it all in one place. An additional benefit is that a git blame on the changelog file should always be able to get you to (near) where a particular change was made.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants