Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better /scibowl/ #78

Open
cchan opened this issue Apr 27, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

Better /scibowl/ #78

cchan opened this issue Apr 27, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@cchan
Copy link

cchan commented Apr 27, 2015

Hi again :D

There's a few ways in which this scibowl section is lacking; particularly:

  • There's 5 seconds to buzz, but once there's a buzz they have about one second to START answering (or else it's a stall) and they have to KEEP answering until they're done (or else it's a stall), but they can talk/type as long as they want. Latency would be an issue in enforcing this though. (I'll fork and see if I can make sense of your code enough to try this)
  • Answers are a lot harder to parse. Especially on math computation ones. 0.2222 or 2/9? 2pir or 2πr? Also especially on the multiple-answer ones, where the "by name or number" answer is never correctly parsed.
  • NSB sample sets are really easy. Not sure where harder questions would be obtained though. If I ask, my scibowl team might donate some that they don't usually use, idk.
  • Bonuses are fun! Although this would require a team element, which is hard when you have to type your collaboration.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant