Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SockJS Protocol support for Netty. #4997

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

SockJS Protocol support for Netty. #4997

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

eun-ice
Copy link
Contributor

@eun-ice eun-ice commented Mar 17, 2016

Motivation:
Provide support for SockJS [1] which is a WebSocket emulation protocol
which can fallback to different protocol in case WebSocket support in
not supported.

Modifications:
Added a codes-sockjs module which contains all the code.

Result:
SockJS clients can now be used with a Netty server configured with
SockJS.

Credits:

This is just a rebase of the pull request #3046 by @danbev

[1] https://github.com/sockjs

Motivation:
Provide support for SockJS [1] which is a WebSocket emulation protocol
which can fallback to different protocol in case WebSocket support in
not supported.

Modifications:
Added a codes-sockjs module which contains all the code.

Result:
SockJS clients can now be used with a Netty server configured with
SockJS.

Credits:

This is just a rebase of the pull request [2] by @danbev

[1] https://github.com/sockjs
[2] #3046
@normanmaurer
Copy link
Member

@eun-ice I will review this soon but that said I think this will not make it into 4.1.0

@normanmaurer normanmaurer self-assigned this Mar 18, 2016
@eun-ice
Copy link
Contributor Author

eun-ice commented Mar 18, 2016

@normanmaurer thank you very much. If it's not going to make it into 4.1.0 I will publish this as a separate module and create a new pull request for 5.0.

@Scottmitch
Copy link
Member

@eun-ice - I think this branch should be sufficient. 5.0 has been deprecated and is no longer maintained #4466.

@eun-ice
Copy link
Contributor Author

eun-ice commented Mar 18, 2016

@Scottmitch thanks for the heads-up.

@danbev
Copy link
Member

danbev commented Mar 18, 2016

Glad to see the interest in this again. Let me know if there is anything I can help out with.

@eun-ice
Copy link
Contributor Author

eun-ice commented Mar 19, 2016

@danbev great to hear you are still around. If you want to help you could review my changes to your pull request. It's just a few lines changed https://github.com/netty/netty/files/177875/rebase-danbev-netty-sockjs-4.1.patch.zip

@danbev
Copy link
Member

danbev commented Mar 21, 2016

@eun-ice This looks good to me! If possible could we keep this in the original PR so that we don't have two different ones for the same thing?
I've rebased and updated the original PR, inlining it with the current version and fixing the compilation/test failures just like you provided. I've also updated the code to not use deprecated method/classes. I'll have a little more time on my hands now and can be more involved than previously.

@eun-ice
Copy link
Contributor Author

eun-ice commented Mar 21, 2016

@danbev feel free to close this PR, it is all your work.

@eun-ice eun-ice closed this Mar 21, 2016
@eun-ice
Copy link
Contributor Author

eun-ice commented Mar 21, 2016

closed in favor of #3046

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants