-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move println to io #655
Comments
Actually many do
What will we get from this except the need to import? I personally never like the need to import BTW Go has builtin |
I think we should keep builtin as small as possible and packages more grouped. We should decide what package is for what and break off pieces into those packages. |
I agree that some stuff could (and maybe should) be moved from
Also, if there would be strong arguments for moving println out of builtin, then the question arise - should it be |
Maybe this would be a good approach? |
@swork1 I find it confusing. I saw many posts on the internet people asking why Go have 2 println functions. I don't think we have that problem they have, that they solved by having 2 println functions. We should have only one. Moving to |
I'm going to close this one for now. We can reopen if needed |
Most languages don't have
Println
builtin (with the notable exception being rust). The rest have them in an Io / Console or other package. I think we should follow this.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: