You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I recently ran DeltaCode on two ScanCode scans of the same codebase (which happened to be e2fsprogs-1.44.2). Both scans were run with ScanCode v2.9.2 -- the difference:
One scan was run with the latest 2.9.2 release.
The other scan was run from a post-release branch (new-license-rules) in which several license-detection rules had been changed from those in the 2.9.2 release.
DeltaCode detected 0 deltas -- if a file's sha1 is the same in the two codebases being compared, the file is treated as unmodified; and in this case, the sha1 attribute of each file remained unchanged.
However, there may be use cases where detection of a change in some other attribute(s) -- including a ScanCode-specific attribute like the identification/characterization of a license -- would be valuable to the user, perhaps provided through use of an attribute-specific option/flag.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I recently ran DeltaCode on two ScanCode scans of the same codebase (which happened to be
e2fsprogs-1.44.2
). Both scans were run with ScanCode v2.9.2 -- the difference:new-license-rules
) in which several license-detection rules had been changed from those in the 2.9.2 release.DeltaCode detected 0 deltas -- if a file's
sha1
is the same in the two codebases being compared, the file is treated asunmodified
; and in this case, thesha1
attribute of each file remained unchanged.However, there may be use cases where detection of a change in some other attribute(s) -- including a ScanCode-specific attribute like the identification/characterization of a license -- would be valuable to the user, perhaps provided through use of an attribute-specific option/flag.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: