Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prefix non SPDX licenses "LicenseRef-scancode-" #1307

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2018

Conversation

furuholm
Copy link
Contributor

@furuholm furuholm commented Dec 7, 2018

Fix for #532

ScanCode can detetect many more licenses than those listed in the
SPDX standard. Such licenses are considered external and are
named LicenseRef-xxx. This change adds a 'LicenseRef-scancode-'
prefix to such licenses to clarify that the license refers to the
license as defined by ScanCode and avoid name collisions with
output from other license scanners.

Signed-off-by: Tobias Furuholm tobiasfuruholm@gmail.com

ScanCode can detetect many more licenses than those listed in the
SPDX standard. Such licenses are considered external and are
named LicenseRef-xxx. This change adds a 'LicenseRef-scancode-'
prefix to such licenses to clarify that the license refers to the
license as defined by ScanCode and avoid name collisions with
output from other license scanners.

Signed-off-by: Tobias Furuholm <tobiasfuruholm@gmail.com>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 7, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #1307 into develop will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1307      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    84.11%   84.13%   +0.02%     
===========================================
  Files          117      117              
  Lines        13119    13119              
===========================================
+ Hits         11035    11038       +3     
+ Misses        2084     2081       -3
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/formattedcode/output_spdx.py 93.08% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
src/scancode/extract_cli.py 88% <0%> (+3%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update adefe29...ed9f861. Read the comment docs.

1 similar comment
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 7, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #1307 into develop will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1307      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    84.11%   84.13%   +0.02%     
===========================================
  Files          117      117              
  Lines        13119    13119              
===========================================
+ Hits         11035    11038       +3     
+ Misses        2084     2081       -3
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/formattedcode/output_spdx.py 93.08% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
src/scancode/extract_cli.py 88% <0%> (+3%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update adefe29...ed9f861. Read the comment docs.

@pombredanne
Copy link
Member

@furuholm thank you! Looking good and merging,

@pombredanne pombredanne merged commit b51c74a into aboutcode-org:develop Dec 10, 2018
sschuberth added a commit to oss-review-toolkit/ort that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2019
Like ScanCode itself does for SPDX file output as of

aboutcode-org/scancode-toolkit#1307

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth <sebastian.schuberth@here.com>
sschuberth added a commit to oss-review-toolkit/ort that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2019
Like ScanCode itself does for SPDX output file formats as of

aboutcode-org/scancode-toolkit#1307

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth <sebastian.schuberth@here.com>
sschuberth added a commit to oss-review-toolkit/ort that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2019
Like ScanCode itself does for SPDX output file formats as of

aboutcode-org/scancode-toolkit#1307

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth <sebastian.schuberth@here.com>
sschuberth added a commit to oss-review-toolkit/ort that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2019
Like ScanCode itself does for SPDX output file formats as of

aboutcode-org/scancode-toolkit#1307

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth <sebastian.schuberth@here.com>
sschuberth added a commit to oss-review-toolkit/ort that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2019
Like ScanCode itself does for SPDX output file formats as of

aboutcode-org/scancode-toolkit#1307

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth <sebastian.schuberth@here.com>
sschuberth added a commit to oss-review-toolkit/ort that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2019
Like ScanCode itself does for SPDX output file formats as of

aboutcode-org/scancode-toolkit#1307

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth <sebastian.schuberth@here.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants