We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi sir,
I use seqkit to filt out the sequence that contain "N" in my short reads file.
But i ignore the "paired" issue at the first.
I just use the filtered-not-totally-paired short reads to polish my genome.
The seq_split is working fine with the filtered-not-totally-paired short reads.
There is no bug info during the whole analysis.
But i am not sure that whether this kind of file can generate the right polished genome.
Do i need to filter out the unpaired reads after i filter out the containing "N" reads to get the good-paired NGS_1.fq and NGS_2.fq ?
Thanks a lot.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, you should filter out the unpaired reads. seq_split dose not check whether your input files are legal if you set paired option.
seq_split
paired
Sorry, something went wrong.
Thanks a lot Have a nice day : )
No branches or pull requests
Hi sir,
I use seqkit to filt out the sequence that contain "N" in my short reads file.
But i ignore the "paired" issue at the first.
I just use the filtered-not-totally-paired short reads to polish my genome.
The seq_split is working fine with the filtered-not-totally-paired short reads.
There is no bug info during the whole analysis.
But i am not sure that whether this kind of file can generate the right polished genome.
Do i need to filter out the unpaired reads after i filter out the containing "N" reads to get the good-paired NGS_1.fq and NGS_2.fq ?
Thanks a lot.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: