Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some confusion about the seq_split and the paried fasta file #42

Closed
AntetokounmJie opened this issue Jul 30, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Comments

@AntetokounmJie
Copy link

Hi sir,

I use seqkit to filt out the sequence that contain "N" in my short reads file.

But i ignore the "paired" issue at the first.

I just use the filtered-not-totally-paired short reads to polish my genome.

The seq_split is working fine with the filtered-not-totally-paired short reads.

There is no bug info during the whole analysis.

But i am not sure that whether this kind of file can generate the right polished genome.

Do i need to filter out the unpaired reads after i filter out the containing "N" reads to get the good-paired NGS_1.fq and NGS_2.fq ?

Thanks a lot.

@moold
Copy link
Member

moold commented Jul 31, 2020

Yes, you should filter out the unpaired reads. seq_split dose not check whether your input files are legal if you set paired option.

@AntetokounmJie
Copy link
Author

Yes, you should filter out the unpaired reads. seq_split dose not check whether your input files are legal if you set paired option.

Thanks a lot
Have a nice day : )

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants