-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CSA 2015 FRQ #104
Comments
|
NAME: Vardaan Sinha
|
|
|
Solutions to FRQ's + Reflections
|
|
Emma Shen |
Drew Reed, Period 1 (2/25/2024)
|
|
-------- ⬆️ ⬆️⬆️ Bonus scoring, graded 1.125 basis above this line ⬆️ ⬆️⬆️ -------------- Scoring guidelines...A. 1 point for each FRQ. 1.1 or .9 basis for above or below the line per FRQ. Correct complete and running in Jupyter Notebook meets the basis. B. Please assist with FRQ association issue. Read or review a couple of my comments, including Vishnu comments to qualify you to grade. 4 or 3.6 is basis. Highlight extras with screen shot or code fragment that is remarkable. Two minute review... Close the books.
|
Tanisha Patil Note : NB Convert is being weird, I am trying to fix this now |
Vivian Ni |
Shivansh Goel |
Edwin Abraham
|
Toby Leeder
|
In Progress |
Haoxuan Tong |
Shaurya Goel
|
Aaron Rubin
|
FRQ final 9/8 on indicators
10%, FRQ live 1/.8 on indicators... Issue/Live Review (2 minutes on live review)
45% FRQ code 4/3.6 on indicators... FRQ is assigned here
45% FRQ associations 4/3.6 on indicators. Show how FRQs or principles of FRQs are incorporated into to your final project.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: