You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
According to https://docs.diy-trio.org/en/latest/settings/configuration/preferences/othersettings.html#remaining-carbs-cap a value of 90 is the absolute minimum for "Remaining Carbs Cap" in Preferences (all the wayyyy at the bottom :)). However, the app allows you to set a value far lower than that. If the limit is supposed to be 90 at the lowest in accordance with the docs, not accepting lower values in that field may be a good idea.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I do not agree that values below 90 should be 'illegal'. The purpose of this variable is to set a limit on the maximum amount of carbs allowed to remain after 4h.
Apart from the docs saying so, can anyone articulate a reason why the remaining carbs cap shouldn't be set lower than 90? A significant proportion of people will never have a COB anywhere near 90 even right after a meal, let alone 4 hours later, so for those people setting 90 as a hard limit for this variable means it serves no purpose at all. E.g. my son typically consumes less than 90g carbs per day.
From determine-basal.js, line 1243-1244:
var remainingCarbs = Math.max(0, meal_data.mealCOB - totalCA - meal_data.carbs*remainingCarbsIgnore);
remainingCarbs = Math.min(remainingCarbsCap,remainingCarbs);
[the infotext in PreferencesEditorStateModel.swift is also incorrect, I will log an issue report]
According to https://docs.diy-trio.org/en/latest/settings/configuration/preferences/othersettings.html#remaining-carbs-cap a value of 90 is the absolute minimum for "Remaining Carbs Cap" in Preferences (all the wayyyy at the bottom :)). However, the app allows you to set a value far lower than that. If the limit is supposed to be 90 at the lowest in accordance with the docs, not accepting lower values in that field may be a good idea.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: