New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FIX] Allow both vmin and threshold argument values to be used in plotting functions using colorscale
#3945
Conversation
ymzayek
commented
Sep 1, 2023
- Closes [BUG] In plot_to_surf vmin is set to 0 despite not setting a threshold #3944
👋 @ymzayek Thanks for creating a PR! Until this PR is ready for review, you can include the [WIP] tag in its title, or leave it as a github draft. Please make sure it is compliant with our contributing guidelines. In particular, be sure it checks the boxes listed below.
For new features:
For bug fixes:
We will review it as quick as possible, feel free to ping us with questions if needed. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3945 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 91.75% 91.76% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 134 134
Lines 15751 15747 -4
Branches 3283 3106 -177
==========================================
- Hits 14453 14451 -2
+ Misses 753 752 -1
+ Partials 545 544 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes 📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, but how can we make sure that the behavior is consistent across backends and for the many parameter settings ?
@bthirion I guess it is tested on a higher level in some cases where |
There is an external issue related to the failing jobs that has just been reported to github community forum: https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/65912 |
Sounds reasonable, but I'm afraid you're a bit optimistic regarding the consistency of the codebase ;-) |
I guess that I share that optimism and in the worst case scenario, we'll handle inconsistencies when we become aware of them. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good with me
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can't sport any big issue, so this is an OK.
Thanks @ymzayek |