-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pinned MUCs in channel-list? #87
Comments
Do you think there is a way to flag some rooms server side (through XMPP service discovery or other stuff)? Alternatively, we can display rooms order by name in |
So it seems many clients actually do pinning. I've opened https://codeberg.org/joinjabber/support/issues/5 to keep track of progress in the community. There is certainly something to be done in the standard. If we're only talking about JoinJabber, doing XEP-0469, only usable with bookmarks2, and add default bookmarks for anonymous users, I guess it would work. As XMPP Web seems to be handling bookmarks even for guests. |
I'm confused about set default bookmark. |
Yeah, that is what I actually thought first. Simply add a comma separated list of pinned room JIDs to the xmpp-web config file and do the filtering and sorting client side in JS. Ideally this could include an option to hide all non-pinned/featured rooms unless someone uses the search to find additional chats. Pinned default bookmarks sounds like a good idea, but AFAIK the room list is a discovery query on the default muc-component and thus has nothing to do with bookmarks directly, right? |
Currently yeah that's how it's handled in XMPP Web, disco#items, but it also queries for bookmarks anyway.
It's possible for the XMPP server to pre-configure a list of bookmarks for accounts. |
Ok, I handle a |
Intended behavior
It can be a bit confusing for non-techy users to find the right place on joining first and seeing the unsorted list on channels to join. This is mainly for the guess access.
Solution
There could be an option to pin 1-2 specific MUCs to the top of the list that are highlighted for new users to join.
Thanks!
Alternatives
No response
Priority
Should-have
Users scope
guests
Affected features
rooms list
Pull request
no
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: